Yellow Ipê Program
Project/Juridiction proponent
Name | Website | Location of headquarters | Organization type |
---|---|---|---|
Ecológica Assessoria Ltda | ND | Brazil | Private for profit |
Project/Juridiction Partners
Name | Website | Location of headquarters | Organization type |
---|
Project characteristics
- ID-RECCO ID893
- Project status 2022Ongoing
- Project nameYellow Ipê Program
- Secondary name
- CountryBrazil
- Last IDRECCO update year2022
- Size (in hectare)86091.6
- Start yearND
- End year2050
- Duration30
- Project descriptionThe Yellow Ipê Grouped REDD Project is located in the municipalities of Novo Aripuanã and Borba, south of Amazonas state, in the Northern region of Brazil. The Trans Amazonian Highway BR 230 is located in the south of the project region and, along its route, cattle raising can be found, which is one of the many agents to deforestation in the region. The primary objective of the Yellow Ipê Grouped REDD Project is to avoid unplanned deforestation (AUD) of a specific region within the municipalities of Novo Aripuanã and Borba. The first Project activity instance has an area of 86,097.67ha, as it is part of two private properties in Novo Aripuanã, consisting of 100% Amazon rainforest. However, other REDD project instances can be added into this grouped project activity in the future, as long as they comply with the eligibility criteria defined by the methodology and of the VCS Standard. Besides the ecological and carbon benefits of the project, a proportion of the carbon credits generated will be dedicated to improving social and environmental conditions for the local community around the project area, specifically contributing to environmental education and other social activities. The contribution to sustainability is being monitored applying the SOCIALCARBON® Standard, which is based on six key indicators: Biodiversity; Natural; Financial; Human; Social and Carbon Resources. This REDD project is expected to avoid a predicted 25,680.81ha of deforestation, equating to around 8,199,069 tCO2e in emissions reductions
- Objective 1climate
- Objective 2social development
- Objective 3biodiversity conservation
- Deforestation driverscattlegrazing| infrastructure |local livelihoods
- Type of foresthumid
- Project activityARR|REDD|Other
- Project TypeREDD
- Details for Afforestation/Reforestation activityplantation
- Multiple locations?yes
- Jurisdiction level 1State: Amazonas
- Jurisdiction level 2Municipalities of Novo Aripuanã and Borba
Carbon accounting
- Crediting period2020-2050
- Period to calculate annual carbon credits2020-2049
- Annual carbon credits442708.3
- Total carbon credits13281249
- Leakage is expected?no
- Carbon pools includedAbove ground biomass | Below ground biomass
- Gasses includedCH4 | N2O
- Reference period start year2010
- Reference period end year2019
- Carbon standard 1VCS
Carbon certification
- Carbon standard 1 Progressregistered
- Carbon standard 1 Publication date44296
- Carbon standard 1 Weblinkshttps://registry.verra.org/mymodule/ProjectDoc/Project_ViewFile.asp?FileID=56682&IDKEY=8kjalskjf098234kj28098sfkjlf098098kl32lasjdflkj909l78164478
- Carbon standard 1 Expiry dateND
- Carbon standard 2none
- Carbon standard 2 ProgressND
- Carbon standard 2 Publication dateND
- Carbon standard 2 WeblinksND
- Carbon standard 2 Expiry dateND
- Carbon standard 3none
- Carbon standard 3 ProgressND
- Carbon standard 3 Publication dateND
- Carbon standard 3 WeblinksND
- Carbon standard 3 Expiry dateND
- Source of informationVCS PDD (https://registry.verra.org/mymodule/ProjectDoc/Project_ViewFile.asp?FileID=56475&IDKEY=skjalskjf098234kj28098sfkjlf098098kl32lasjdflkj909f77879025)
Community level intervention
- Any monetary benefits?Yes
- Monetary benefit typeConditional
- Monetary benefit detailPayment of pensions for participants, and facilitation to enter in payment for environmental services scheme
- Provides employment?ND
- Are there non-cash benefits?Yes
- Economic activities - typeNTFP
- Is there tenure clarification?No
- Is there environmental education?Yes
- Is there forest access restriction or control/monitoring of deforestation?Yes
- Is there forest enhancement?Yes
- Is there community infrastracture improvement?No
- Is there other community benefits?Yes